ACTION-REFLECTION-ADAPTATION-PUBLIC LEARNING: Excerpts from the Life of a Pracademic
“Action-Reflection-Adaptation-Public Learning: Excerpts from the Life of a Pracademic. Larry Susskind in conversation with Shekhar Chandra” is the ninth booklet published as part of the AESOP Young Academics ‘Conversation in Planning Theory and Practice’ project whose aim is learning through conversations across generations of planners. In the first phase of the project, the booklets were divided into three series or themes, such as the use of philosophical theories in planning, planning theories, and planning practices. Now, we have combined these series into a sole and comprehensive structure.
From a pedagogical perspective, the uniqueness of the project is learning through conversations. The booklets aim to provide an introduction to the theories and ideas of senior scholars: what and how they contributed to the field of planning; what and who influenced the development of these theories; and how this implicated/reflected on planning debate in theory and/or practice. The young academic authors not only learn from the senior scholars about their work, but also get involved in a conversation with them in order to make sense of how the senior scholars have used these theories in their work, and how such theories are applied in planning theory and practice.
Since Urban Planning is a practice-oriented discipline, many raise questions about the role of theories in the discipline. Most of our published booklets have addressed the debate and interdependency between theory and practice in planning. Previous booklets also demonstrated various ways of understanding planning theory, urban theory, or critical theory. They show how the academic discipline of urban planning evolved, in different times and contexts, often cross-pollinating with other disciplines, and creating new branches.
This booklet regards the relationships among theories and practices and the positions scholars and academics can and should assume while reflecting and working in the realm of public involvement and dispute resolution. It concerns some of the major scholarly works and important thoughts of Larry Susskind and is enriched with a number of voices of other scholars who have worked together with him, providing their own glimpses on his work.
Abt, C. 2002. Serious Games. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Bacow, L., and Wheeler, M. 1984. Environmental dispute resolution. New York: Plenum press.
Bakker, K. 2012. Water security: Research challenges and opportunities. Science, 337, 914-915.
Berlin, I. 1978. The Hedgehog and the Fox. In Russian Thinkers, ed. H. Hardy. London: Hogarth.
Coase, R.H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P.T., Anderegg, W.R.L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, Ed.W., Carlton, J.S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A.G., Green, S.A., Nuccitelli, D., Jacobs., P., Richardson, M., Winker, B., Painting, R., and Rice, K. 2016. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 48002
Cruikshank, J., and Susskind, L. 1987. Breaking the impasses: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
Davoudi, S. 2006. Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality, DisP: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, 165, 14-25.
Edwards, P., Sharma-Wallace, L., Wreford, A., Holt, L., A Cradock-Henry, N., Flood, S., and Velarde, S. J. 2019. Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: A review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interface. Environmental Research Letters, 14, 1-16.
Fairchild, A. J., and MacKinnon, D. P. 2009. A general model for testing mediation and moderating effects. Prevention Science, 10, 87-99.
Faludi, A. 1973. Planning theory. Oxford: Pergamon press.
Figueres, C., Whiteman, G., Le Quéré, C., and Peters, G. P. 2018. Carbon emissions rise again, Nature, 564, 27–31.
Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., and Patton, B. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., and Patton, B. 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin books.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social science inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gosling, S.N., and Arnell, N.W. 2016. A global assessment of the impact of climate change on waterscarcity. Climate Change 134, 371-385.
GWP. 2000. Integrated Water Resources Management. Global Water Partnership, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Background Papers No. 4, Stockholm.
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
Helman, C., and Fisher, D. NIMBY Nation: The high cost to America of saying no to everything. Forbes, 17 Aug. 2015. Accessed on 28 November 2019.
Howlett, M., and Ramesh, M. 1995. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Innes, J.E. 1995. Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interpretive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, 183-189.
IPCC. 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK,-Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. 2014. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report.
Islam, S., and Susskind, L. 2012. Water Diplomacy: A negotiated approach to complex water networks. New York: The RFF Press Water Policy Series, Routledge.
Islam, S., and Susskind, L. 2015. Understanding the water crisis in Africa and the Middle East: How can science inform policy? Bulletin of the American Scientists, 71, 39-49.
Islam, S., and Susskind, L. 2018. Using complexity science and negotiation theory to resolve boundary-crossing water issues. Journal of Hydrology 562, 589-598.
Kasperson, R., Golding, D., and Tuler, S. 1992. Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks Under Conditions of High Social Distrust. Journal of Social Issues 48, 161-167.
Kunreuther, H., Fitzgerald, K., and Aarts, T. 1993. Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo. Risk Analysis. 13, 301–18.
Luce, R.D., and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and decision: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley
Macey, G. P., and Susskind, L. E. 2001. Secondary effects of environmental justice litigation: The Case of West Dallas Coalition for Environmental Justice vs. EPA. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 20, 431-478.
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P., and Waterfield T. (Eds.). 2018. IPCC summary for policymakers. In Global warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
Mnookin, R., Pepper, S., and Tulumello, A. 2000. Beyond winning: Negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Hare, M., Bacow, L., and Sanderson, D. 1983. Facility siting and public opposition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Oreskes, N., and Conway, E.M. 2011. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to climate change. London, UK: Bloomsbury publishing.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C.B., Norgaard, R.B., and Policansky, D. 1999. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284, 278-282.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. World Bank Policy Research Paper no. WPS 5095.
Poirier-Elliott, M.L. 1984. Improving community acceptance of hazardous waste facilities through alternative systems for mitigating and managing risk, Hazardous Waste, 1, 397-410.
Putnam, R. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games. International Organization 42, 427-460.
Raiffa, H. 2002. Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision-making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. 2008. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. CA: Sage publications.
Richman, B.D. 2001. Mandating negotiations to solve the NIMBY problem: A creative regulatory response. Journal of Environmental Law 20, 223-236.
Rumore, D., Schenk, T., and Susskind, L. 2016. Role-play simulations for climate change adaption, education and engagement. Nature Climate Change 6, 745-750.
Schon, D.A. 1990. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Susskind, L. 2010. Policy & Practice: Responding to the risks posed by climate change: Cities have no choice but to adapt. Town Planning Review 81, 217-235.
Susskind, L E. 1985. The siting puzzle: Balancing economic and environmental gains and losses. Negotiation Journal 5, 157-163.
Susskind, L. 1990. A negotiation credo for controversial siting dispute. Negotiation Journal, 6, 309-314.
Susskind, L. 2013a. Confession of a Pracademic: Searching for a virtuous cycle of theory building, teaching and action research. Negotiation Journal, 29, 225-237.
Susskind, L. 2013b. Water and democracy: New roles for civil society in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 666-677.
Susskind, L. 2014. Good for You, Great for Me: Finding the Trading Zone and Winning at Win-Win Negotiation. Public Affairs.
Susskind, L., and Cruikshank, J. 1989. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. Basic Books.
Susskind, L., and Cruikshank, J. 2006. Breaking Robert’s Rule: the new way to run meetings, build consensus, and get results. New York: Oxford University Press.
Susskind, L., and Field, P. 2010. Dealing with an angry public: The mutual gains approach to dispute resolution. New York: The Free press.
Susskind, L., and Islam, S. 2012. Water Diplomacy: Creating value and building trust in transboundary negotiations. Science & Diplomacy, 1, 1-7.
Susskind, L., and Schenk, T. 2014. Can games really change the course of history? Négociations, 2, 29-39.
Susskind, L., Doty, A., and Hasz, A. 2018. Planning for readiness—and growth. Planning, 84, 32-36.
Susskind, L., McKerarnen, S., and Thomas-Lamer, J. 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Susskind, L., Rumore, D., Hulet, C., and Field, P. 2015. Managing climate risks in coastal communities: Strategies for engagement, readiness and adaptation. Anthem Press.
Susskind, L.E., and Ali, S.H. 2014. Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Susskind, L.E., and Ozawa, C. 1983. Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector: Mediator Accountability and the Public Interest Problem. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 255-279
Susskind, L.E., Bacow, L., and Wheeler, M. 1983. Mediation in Environmental Regulatory Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishers
The United Nations World Water Development Report. 2019. Leaving No One Behind. UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme.
USGCRP. 2018. Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II: Report-in-Brief [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 186 pp. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.RiB
Whitehead, A.N. 1997. Science and the modern world. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Keywords:Action, Reflection, Adaptation, Public Learning, Planning
Copyright (c) 2020 Shekhar Chandra, Larry Susskind
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.