Eprint / Version 1

THE WORK OF ROY

Reckonings & Encounters

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24306/aeprints.3

Additional Files

cover of the work of roy

Abstract

Ananya Roy is Professor of Urban Planning, Social Welfare and Geography and inaugural Director of the Institute on Inequality and Democracy at UCLA Luskin. She holds The Meyer and Renee Luskin Chair in Inequality and Democracy. Previously she was on the faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, where she founded and played a leadership role in several academic programs including those concerned with poverty research and poverty action. Ananya’s research and scholarship has a determined focus on poverty and inequality and lies in four domains: how the urban poor in cities from Kolkata to Chicago face and fight eviction, foreclosure, and displacement; how global financialization, working in varied realms from microfinance to real-estate speculation, creates new markets in debt and risk; how the efforts to manage and govern the problem of poverty reveal the contradictions and limits of liberal democracy; how economic prosperity and aspiration in the global South is creating new potentialities for programs of human development and social welfare. Ananya is the recipient of several awards including the Paul Davidoff book award, which recognizes scholarship that advances social justice, for Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development (Routledge, 2010); the Distinguished Teaching Award, the highest teaching recognition that the University of California, Berkeley bestows on its faculty; and the Excellence in Achievement award of the Cal Alumni Associ-ation, a lifetime achievement award which celebrates her contributions to the University of California and public sphere.

In just over 15 years, Ananya Roy has constructed a rich body of work exploring the politics and ethics of urban and planning theory, to which this booklet attempts to do justice. Throughout her career, she has steadily challenged the boundaries and foreclosures of planning theory, in particular through her engagement with the study of poverty. Roy has devoted much of her writing to provincializing what she sometimes calls “grand theory” by engaging in a growing effort by planning and urban theorists to defamiliarize the subjects, bounds, and origins of planning theory. She uses the complicated relationship between poverty and planning as a threshold for questioning how planning theory has beenconstructed, imagined, and defended. The challenges she poses through her research and writing offeran expansive vision of how theory can grapple with the histories, subjects, and intents of planningas a field of practice and study.

References

Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), 58–89.

Abu-Lughod, J. (1999). New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America’s Global Cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Abu-Lughod, J. (2007). The challenge of comparative case studies. City, 11(3), 399–404.

Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.

Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. (K. Attell, trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://isbndb.com/d/book/state_of_exception

Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 33–44.

Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295–310.

Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1–19.

Boggs, J. S., Rantisi, N. M. (2003). The “relational turn” in economic geography. Journal of Eco-nomic Geography, 3(2), 109–116. http://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.109

Brenner, N., Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.

Buck-Morss, S., Benjamin, W. (1989). The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Ar-cades project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.

Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–32.

Comaroff, J., Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Routledge.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Pantheon Books.

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. http://doi.org/10.2307/466240

Garland, D. (2014). What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealo-

gies and their critical preconditions. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 365–384. http://doi.

org/10.1177/1462474514541711

Gates Jr., H. L. (1988). The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. Oxford University Press.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. and ed. Q. Hoare, G. N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.

Gregory, D. (2004). The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0412/2003026672.html

Hall, S. (1988). The toad in the garden: Thatcherism among the theorists. In C. Nelson, L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. University of Illinois Press.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

Hart, G. (2007). Changing concepts of articulation: political stakes in South Africa today. Review of African Political Economy, 34(111), 85–101.

Hart, G. P. (1986). Power, Labor, and Livelihood: Processes of Change in Rural Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?location=/exec/obidos/ASIN/0691130213&AWSAccessKeyId=1TQA6S4ATNFN6EYN0H82

Hooks, Bell. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Pluto Press.

Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Commentary: Comparing comparative urbanisms. Urban Geography, 33(6), 904–914.

Jessop, B. (1994). Post-Fordism and the state. In Post-Fordism: A Reader (pp. 251–79).

Joyce, P. (2003). The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City. London: Verso.

Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.

Kamete, A. Y. (2009). In the service of tyranny: Debating the role of planning in Zimbabwe’s urban “clean-up” operation. Urban Studies, 46(4), 897–922. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009102134

Katz, M. B. (2015). What kind of problem is poverty? The archaeology of an idea. In A. Roy, E. S. Crane (eds), Territories of Poverty: Rethinking North and South (pp. 39–78). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1974), La production de l’espace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.

Li, T. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Dur-ham, NC: Duke University Press. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip074/2006035585. html

Machler, L. and Miltz, D. (2015). Innes. The Evolution of Communicative Planning Theory. Gronin-gen: InPlanning.

Massey, D. B. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Mignolo, W. (2005). The Idea of Latin America. Wiley.

Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50. http://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297

Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Femi-nist Review, 61–88.

Mouffe, C. (1988). Hegemony and new political subjects: Toward a new concept of democracy. In

C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political (1st edn). London: Routledge.

Mukhopadhyay, C. (2015). Faludi. Introducing a theory of planning. Groningen: InPlanning.

Olds, K. (2001). Practices for “process geographies”: A view from within and outside the periphery. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 19(2), 127–36.

Ong, A. (2011). Introduction: Worlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global. In A. Ong, A. Roy (eds), Worlding Cities (pp. 1–26). Wiley-Blackwell.

Ong, A. and Roy A. (eds) (2011). Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of being Global, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Rabinow, P. (1996). Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ranciere, J. (2009). Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Polity.

Rankin, K. N. (2001). Governing development: Neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic Woman. Economy and Society, 30(1), 18–37.

Rankin, K. N. (2009). Critical development studies and the praxis of planning. City, 13(2–3), 219–229.

Rankin, K. (2012). The praxis of critical development studies. Antipode, 44(2), 522–528. http://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00970_2.x

Rich, A. (1991). An Atlas of the Difficult World: Poems 1988-1991 (First). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Rich, A. (1994). Blood, Bread, and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-1985 (Reissue). New York: W.

W. Norton & Company.

Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Ur-ban & Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554.

Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.

Roy, A. (2001). A “public” muse: On planning convictions and feminist contentions. Journal of Plan-ning Education and Research, 21(2), 109–126. http://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x0102100201

Roy, A. (2002). City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty (illustrated edn). Uni-versity of Minnesota Press.

Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147. http://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689

Roy, A. (2006). Praxis in the time of empire. Planning Theory, 5(1), 7–29. http://doi. org/10.1177/1473095206061019

Roy, A. (2007). Calcutta Requiem: Gender and the Politics of Poverty. Pearson India.

Roy, A. (2009a). Strangely familiar: Planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality. Plan-ning Theory, 8(1), 7–11.

Roy, A. (2009b). The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory.

Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665

Roy, A. (2010). Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development. New York: Rout-ledge.

Roy, A. (2011a). Commentary: Placing planning in the world—transnationalism as

practice and critique. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(4), 406–415. http://doi. org/10.1177/0739456X11405060

Roy, A. (2011b). Conclusion: Postcolonial urbanism: Speed, hysteria, mass dreams. In A. Ong, A. Roy (eds), Worlding Cities (pp. 307–335). Wiley-Blackwell.

Roy, A. (2011c). Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning.

Planning Theory, 10(1), 6–15. http://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210386065

Roy, A. (2012a). Afterword: Entrepreneurs of millennial capitalism. Antipode, 44(2), 545–553. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00970_6.x

Roy, A. (2012b). Ethnographic circulations: Space–time relations in the worlds of poverty manage-ment. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 31 – 41. http://doi.org/10.1068/a44180

Roy, A. (2012c). Subjects of risk: Technologies of gender in the making of millennial modernity. Public Culture, 24(1 66), 131–155. http://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1498001

Roy, A. (2014, February 13). Before theory: In memory of Janet Abu-Lughod. Jadaliyya. Retrieved from

Roy A. (2014). Worlding the South. Toward a post-colonial urban theory. In S. Parnell, S. Oldfield (eds), Worlding the South. The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, London: Rou-tledge.

Roy, A. (2015a). The aporias of poverty. In A. Roy, E. S. Crane (eds), Territories of Poverty: Re-thinking North and South (pp. 1–35). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Roy, A. (2015b). Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 40(1), 200–209.

Roy, A. (2016). What is urban about critical urban theory? Urban Geography, 37(6), 810–823.

Roy, A., Crane, E. S. (eds). (2015). Territories of Poverty: Rethinking North and South. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Roy, A., Schrader, S., Crane, E. S. (2015a). Gray areas: The war on poverty at home and abroad. In A. Roy, E. S. Crane (eds), Territories of Poverty: Rethinking North and South (pp. 289–314). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Roy, A., Schrader, S., Crane, E. S. (2015b). “The anti-poverty hoax”: Development, pacification, and the making of community in the global 1960s. Cities, 44, 139–145.

Roy, A. (2016). “What is Urban about Critical Urban Theory?” Urban Geography, 37:6, 810-823.

Said, E. W. (2007). The Edward Said Reader. M. Bayoumi, A. Rubin (eds). New York: Vintage.

Santucci, A. A., La Porta L. (2010). Antonio Gramsci. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–75.

Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Rout-ledge.

Sparke, M. (2006). Political geographies of globalization (2): Governance. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 357.

Spivak, G. C. (1996). The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. D. Lan-dry, G. MacLean, (eds). Psychology Press.

Spivak, G. C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Pres-ent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Spivak, G. C. (2008). Other Asias (1st ed). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 21–27.

Subcomandante Marcos. (2000, November). Ideas are also weapons. Toward Freedom. Re-trieved from www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Mexico/ideas_weapons.html

Taylor, P. J. (2000). World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globaliza-tion. Political Geography, 19(1), 5–32.

Wallace, D. F. (2009). This Is Water: Some Thoughts, Delivered on a Significant Occasion, about Living a Compassionate Life. Hachette UK.

Watts, M. (2012). Book review symposium: Poverty Capital. Antipode, 44(2), 545–553.

Williams, R. (1978). Marxism and Literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Lexing-ton, MA: Lexington Books.

Yiftachel, O. (2009). Critical theory and “gray space”: Mobilization of the colonized. City, 13(2–3), 246–63.

Yiftachel, O., Huxley, M. (2000). Debating dominance and relevance: Notes on the communica-tive turn in planning theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 907–913.

Posted

2018-07-01

Keywords:

Planning, Planning Theory, Politics, Ethics, Ananya Roy