All rights reservedAntoniadis, PanayotisApostol, Ileana2024-09-182024-09-182016978-85-7785-551-1https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14235/1998Proceedings of the IV World Planning Schools Congress, July 3-8th, 2016 : Global crisis, planning and challenges to spatial justice in the north and in the southWireless technology, low-cost open hardware and FLOSS software make it increasingly easy for people with less-technical inclinations to build their own local networks. They can thus become hosts of local communications between those in physical proximity, without a need to be connected to the commercial Internet, and to buy a domain name or online space in commercial platforms. The coverage can vary in range, and thus the relevant types of applications, depending on the number of connected network nodes. In the simplest scenario, a single wireless router can host the local application, and the coverage radius could extend up to several hundred meters. Through the formation of a network of such devices, which may be technically configured as a ‘mesh’ --often called a wireless community network-- the network can organically grow according to the voluntary contributions of individuals or communities. Links between distant locations can only be prevented by physical obstacles, and thus such a network can expand as far as line-of-sight allows. This DIY networking technology has special characteristics compared to the public Internet in terms of privacy, ownership, and control, and thus holds a unique potential for empowering citizens to shape their hybrid urban space toward conviviality and collective awareness (Antoniadis et al. 2014; Antoniadis & Apostol 2015). It can also play the role of a “boundary object” for facilitating interdisciplinary interactions and participatory processes between different actors such as researchers, engineers, practitioners, artists, designers, local authorities, and activists.EnglishopenAccessconferenceObject1261-1263