All rights reservedRongwiriyaphanich, Suwanna2024-04-032024-04-032010978-80-01-05782-7https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14235/1513Book of proceedings: Annual AESOP Congress, 2010 Space is Luxury, Aalto, July 7-10thThis paper examines the applicability and limitations of the proposed analytical framework. The framework was developed to facilitate an analysis of territorial development processes taken culture as an important element shaping planning processes and spatial outcomes. Five main principles underpin the proposed analytical framework are the concept of social-ecological system (Folke et al. 2005), culture-changing dynamics (Gullestrup 2006), Institutional Analysis and Development framework (Ostrom 2005), five dimensions of cultures (Hofstede and Hofstede 2005) and cultural theory (Thompson et al. 1990). The analysis of territorial development of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, with special emphasis on the impacts of local cultures on policy initiatives and spatial outcomes in relation to flood risk management in the region, is taken as an example for investigation. The analysis shows that despite its potential subjectivity resulted by heuristic interpretation, the proposed analytical framework tends to be a promising approach.EnglishopenAccesslocal culturesflood risk managementBangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR)conferenceObject372-387