Spatial planning systems in Latin America: towards an international comparative perspective
| dc.contributor.author | Galland, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Elinbaum, Pablo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-23T11:00:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-23T11:00:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
| dc.description | Proceedings of the IV World Planning Schools Congress, July 3-8th, 2016 : Global crisis, planning and challenges to spatial justice in the north and in the south | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Spatial planning systems refer to the set of administrative, technical and juridical processes to manage urban and territorial dynamics within specific national contexts (Mazza, 1996; Healey, 1997). As such, spatial planning systems and policies influence spatial development through land-use planning and other regulatory means (CEC, 1997; Newman & Thornley, 1996). Their character is often described in relation to legally established objectives, tools and procedures that form part of national planning systems (Alterman, 2001; Nadin & Stead, 2008), which vary widely across national, sub-national and urban scales. Besides their technical, administrative and juridical dimensions within the public domain [i.e. planning as an institutional technology (Mazza, 1996)], spatial planning systems should also be addressed from their institutional dimension (Janin Rivolin, 2012). For the purposes of analysing and comparing planning systems from an international perspective, aspects such as the interaction between public and private spheres, economic development, social complexity and the diversity of stakeholder interests and values turn out essential. In other words, the diversity of spatial planning systems and policies that influence spatial development processes is not only shaped by the plurality of legal-administrative and technical arrangements, but also by an array of internal and external driving forces such as social models (Nadin & Stead, 2008), planning cultures (Knieling & Othengrafen, 2009) and governance traditions, amongst other dimensions. | |
| dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-85-7785-551-1 | en |
| dc.identifier.pageNumber | 1561-1565 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14235/1916 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | en |
| dc.publisher | AESOP | en |
| dc.rights | openAccess | en |
| dc.rights.license | All rights reserved | en |
| dc.source | Proceedings of the IV World Planning Schools Congress, July 3-8th, 2016 : Global crisis, planning and challenges to spatial justice in the north and in the south | en |
| dc.title | Spatial planning systems in Latin America: towards an international comparative perspective | |
| dc.type | conferenceObject | en |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |