Reversal of priorities and possible confrontations: the role of the planning and the public policies in reduction of inequalities, in the expansion of social justice and in the realization of the right to the city in the metropolis
dc.contributor.author | de Assis Libânio, Clarice | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-18T10:22:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-18T10:22:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
dc.description | Proceedings of the IV World Planning Schools Congress, July 3-8th, 2016 : Global crisis, planning and challenges to spatial justice in the north and in the south | en |
dc.description.abstract | The theme of the right to the city has gained importance in recent years, placed at the center of academic and technical discussions in the domains of planning and management of cities. This relevance, among other factors, is based on the new global configuration (productive, territorial, demographic, economic ...) that in just over half a century, it turned the planet into a predominantly urban environment. In this context, urban studies show that the growth of cities has brought with it the growth of poverty and socio-spatial inequalities, causing severe violation of human rights, social and even civilians, in addition to urban crises related to mobility, environmental pollution, expansion of segregation, increase in violence and risks associated with climate change. Aiming to confront this complex problem has been proposed an integrated view of rights (civil, human, social, etc.) in the expanded concept of Right to the City, which turns out to rescue the propositions by Lefebvre (1969). The right to the city is composed of a series of other rights, multiple, explicit or covert, formalized or simply lived in daily life. The reaffirmation of the right to the city emerges as all the more relevant as the greater the inequalities in living conditions and means of access to goods and services available in urban areas. Such disparities become more pressing in the case of large cities and metropolitan areas, since these places the expansion of the urban fabric and the periphery processes of housing also introduce inequalities in access conditioned by social and spatial mobility. | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-85-7785-551-1 | en |
dc.identifier.pageNumber | 1251-1253 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14235/2001 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en |
dc.publisher | AESOP | en |
dc.rights | openAccess | en |
dc.rights.license | All rights reserved | en |
dc.source | Proceedings of the IV World Planning Schools Congress, July 3-8th, 2016 : Global crisis, planning and challenges to spatial justice in the north and in the south | en |
dc.title | Reversal of priorities and possible confrontations: the role of the planning and the public policies in reduction of inequalities, in the expansion of social justice and in the realization of the right to the city in the metropolis | |
dc.type | conferenceObject | en |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |