1988 The Environment in Planning Education, Dortmund, Germany, 10-12 November
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Open Access Editorials(Taylor and Francis, 1988) Griffiths, Ron; Morphet, Janice; Thornley, AndyReflections on Europe: the 1988 AESOP: Congress Everyone is talking about 1992. However most of the discussion is highly speculative—it would be valuable to know more about the actual thinking in Brussels at the moment. How is planning viewed at the European scale? The Association of European Schools of Planning at its 2nd Annual Congress in Dortmund in November was fortunate in having a speaker from the European Commission in the form of Gunter Schneider, Director of the Directorate for Environment. It was clear from his presentation that 'green' issues are a significant part of the Commission's activity. This has been the case for some time, spurred on by controversies and national policies that detrimentally effect neighbouring countries, including problems of nuclear waste, toxic dumping, agricultural practices, and pollution of the sea. Gunter Schneider explained how the longstanding concern of the Commission was now entering a new phase with an emphasis on the integration of environmental programmes into other programmes such as the economic and social ones. However, whereas the environmental programme has been at the forefront of the Commission's work for some time, its interest in spatial planning as such was just beginning. Up to now, spatial planning has been considered a matter of local concern and therefore not within the remit of the EEC. This attitude is changing. The impact of major projects like the Channel Tunnel and high-speed trains, and shifts such as an ageing northern population, demands for leisure and tourism or the importance of pleasant living conditions in deciding on economic location — all these have spatial implications of European significance. Taken together with the concern for increased integration of policies we can expect spatial planning to be firmly on the Commission agenda in the coming years. There will be a strong message coming across that such planning is essential for the future quality of life and also for the longer term sustainability of economic development. Mrs Thatcher seems to have turned green recently, she will now actually have to implement some of the rhetoric. Planning education and research will also have to respond and place greater importance on environmental aspects. Maybe we have the basis here for a resurrection of the planning system. Is this why the Prime Minister seems so scared of moves towards greater integration of European social policies?Item Open Access Leaflet of the 2nd Annual AESOP Congress The Environment in Planning Education, 1988(AESOP, 1988)Association of European Schools Of Planning Universität Dortmund About AESOP The reasons for establishing AESOP are among others: 1. There is little comparative information about planning schools in Europe. As a rule one knows very little about curricula, aims, research, degrees, professional career prospects and the relation between educational provision and the structure of planning in each country 2. Given the small number of planning schools in most European countries (Britain is an exception), there is a need for a network of European allies to find international support and backing. The discipline which is still young and emerging needs the confidence which an international alliance can foster. 3. The increasing economic integration of Europe will also have an effect on the job market for planners. It will encourage planners to work outside their own country, and require a better knowledge of planning-related conditions and systems in other European countries. 4. Planning problems and environmental issues in all European countries have become much more internationalized. Euro- pean policies effect local and regional economic development and have an impact on the environment. Consequently planning schools have to introduce a more intemnational dimension into planning curricula. The AESOP network is one means to communicate ideas and approaches about how this may be done. 5. By creating a European network of those involved in planning education, opportunities are created which may lead to new comparative research within Europe, lead to the exchange of staff and students and to mutual visits of student groups 6. The policy of the European Commission of intensifying the exchange of students within its members countries will require mutual recognition of credits, of academic degrees and diplomas. AESOP could contribute to facilities such mutual re- cognition by better and comparative information. 7. In Europe, the development of planning knowledge, theory and method is hampered by language constraints. The AESOP network and its activities should encourage communication in other than our respective mother tongues, thus contributing to more cross-national communication and the consolidation of planning as a discipline.